Figure 01: 360 degree performance appraisal system
Source : (Vaidyanathan,2014)
The combination
of knowledge, belief, law, custom moral, Capabilities and habits of a man as a
member of society is known as culture (Tyler, 1998) . Cultural factors are influenced for the
psychological or emotional norms or threats and nature, timing and tasks (Carter, 1986) . Cultural factors
are directly affected for entrepreneurship, innovations, knowledge transfer and
productivity. The productivity through determining social decision-making
process, attitude towards innovation, ability to adjust to economic changes and
through attitudes towards social equality are affected by Culture and cultural
factors (David Throsby, 2001) .
Performance
Appraisal is a procedure of evaluating an employee performance of job in terms
of its requirements. The system's effectiveness is defined as an external
standard. According to literature how well the system is meeting the demands of
the various groups and organizations that are concerned with its activities (Pfeffer, J.
and Salancik, G., 1978) . This approximately is an idea for
doing the correct things or having validity of outcome (Hines, 2000) .
The cultural values
that are operated should be clearly understood to use performance appraisal
system effectively by the organization and national culture is influenced for
it. The performance appraisal practice which is based on individual based
performance has positive impact on organizational outcomes. The cultural factors
are mostly impact on the effectiveness of 3600 degree performance
appraisal process (Peretz, 2016) . It is important to
employees to understand own personality from an outsiders’ perspective. Also,
it has positive effect on productivity and innovation in lower power distance societies.
But 360-degree performance appraisal process is not suitable for the
organizations which have cultures with high power distance. The organizations
which have cultures with strong future orientation are mostly use performance appraisal
process to evaluate employees. Therefore, it is provided basic idea about the
way individuals engage in future oriented behaviors.
The value that
is given by the society for individual opportunities and rights versus loyalty
to the group is referred by individualism and collectivism. Individual
outcomes, lower levels of innovation and turnover are the main factors
organizations with collectivist societies are focused by adopting performance
appraisal system. The cultures those are developed strict rules and norms are
implemented performance appraisal systems to have lower levels of turnover and
higher levels of innovation (Peretz, 2016) .
References
Vaidyanathan, S., 2014.
Analysis and adaptive synchronization of eight-term 3-D polynomial chaotic
systems with three quadratic nonlinearities. The European Physical Journal
Special Topics, 223(8), pp.1519-1529.
Carter, B. &. M. M., 1986. The Changing
Family Life-Cycle:, Boston: Ally & Bacon.
David
Throsby, 2001. Economics and Culture. Sydney: Cambridge University
Press,.
Hines, P. a.
T. D., 2000. Going Lean – A Guide for Implementation,, Cardiff: Lean
EnterpriseResearch Centre, Cardiff Business School.
Peretz, H.,
2016. The Link Between Performance Appraisals and Culture: An Examination
Across 21 Countries, Ort Braude: Northern Colorado Human Resources
Association.
Pfeffer, J.
and Salancik, G., 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource
Dependence Perspective. New York: s.n.
Tyler, 1998.
British Antroplrgist, s.l.: Auruch.





